топ карты осу 3 звезды
Топ карты осу 3 звезды
09 Jul 2015 в 05:51
09 Jul 2015 в 05:51 #1
Драсте, недавно начал играть в осу, накидайте норм карт мне)))) 2-3 звезды лучше.
09 Jul 2015 в 05:51 #2
09 Jul 2015 в 05:55 #3
09 Jul 2015 в 06:09 #4
09 Jul 2015 в 06:11 #5
09 Jul 2015 в 06:13 #6
Осу эт хорошо, только мне из 300+ карт лень искать норм)
09 Jul 2015 в 06:33 #7
у Feint песни задорные и на 2-3 звезды можно назадротствовать знатно)
09 Jul 2015 в 06:34 #8
найс карта, льюис тебе)
09 Jul 2015 в 06:56 #9
09 Jul 2015 в 07:05 #10
у Feint песни задорные и на 2-3 звезды можно назадротствовать знатно)
09 Jul 2015 в 07:07 #11
В чем смысл игры? Какие карты? Как они связаны с песнями?
09 Jul 2015 в 07:11 #12
09 Jul 2015 в 07:12 #13
09 Jul 2015 в 07:19 #14
на второй мапе на стримах фейлюсь
первая анриал(
09 Jul 2015 в 19:07 #15
09 Jul 2015 в 19:10 #16
я же нубасик онли мышь)
09 Jul 2015 в 19:11 #17
Юзай клавиатуру, еще не поздно.
09 Jul 2015 в 19:12 #18
Смысл в убийстве времени, как и в любой другой игре, самый глупый вопрос из всех вообще))
ты бы ещё изики кинул)))
09 Jul 2015 в 19:22 #19
Выбирались они по моей личной системе оценки связанности нот с треком.
09 Jul 2015 в 19:26 #20
09 Jul 2015 в 19:27 #21
только на стримах и инсейн картах и то чутка юзаю, так сказать комбинирую!
09 Jul 2015 в 19:35 #22
Что-то мне подсказывает, что такое возможно только ботом или скриптами.
09 Jul 2015 в 19:39 #23
ну глянь рейтинг биг блека на сайте!
09 Jul 2015 в 19:44 #24
Ах да, наш русскоязычный, обычный парнишка прошёл биг блек на ску с хардроком
Good 3 Star Stream Maps
Нет аккаунта?
Good 3 Star Stream Maps
Some general advice would be to focus on your finger control in every map you play. Focus on good accuracy with triples and stacks as well as streams.
Kheldragar wrote:
Barusamikosu wrote:
Some general advice would be to focus on your finger control in every map you play. Focus on good accuracy with triples and stacks as well as streams.
buny wrote:
Kheldragar wrote:
He said 3 stars; 3.99 is still 3.
Kheldragar wrote:
He said 3 stars; 3.99 is still 3.
I know you’re trying to sound like a smartass, but 3.99 =/= 3, and rounded up it’s 4
Barusamikosu wrote:
buny wrote:
I don’t think I’ve seen any stream heavy maps really low in star rating but if you have anything easier please share so I can try it. 
130 bpm 5 notes at a time. The OP was pretty vague in specifying exactly what maps he wants, seeing as how nearly every map that has a stream in it is going to get its difficulty boosted a lot higher than 3 stars
buny wrote:
Kheldragar wrote:
He said 3 stars; 3.99 is still 3.
I know you’re trying to sound like a smartass, but 3.99 =/= 3, and rounded up it’s 4
So you saying 3 stars is only 3.0-3.49? Really,
Because last time I checked 3.6 has a 3 in it and only the client does a rounding. Or do you mean to say that there should only be 3.00 maps. 3.99 is still 3 stars whether you like it or not. What world do we live in where a 4 star map has a 3 in it; I guess that’s why it’s called 4 stars.
numbers don’t even matter if op struggles with achieving S ranks on normals
learn the basics first before trying to stream
buny wrote:
130 bpm 5 notes at a time. The OP was pretty vague in specifying exactly what maps he wants, seeing as how nearly every map that has a stream in it is going to get its difficulty boosted a lot higher than 3 stars
80% acc to S/SS over time).
Kheldragar wrote:
So you saying 3 stars is only 3.0-3.49? Really,
Because last time I checked 3.6 has a 3 in it and only the client does a rounding. Or do you mean to say that there should only be 3.00 maps. 3.99 is still 3 stars whether you like it or not. What world do we live in where a 4 star map has a 3 in it; I guess that’s why it’s called 4 stars.
Last time I checked, as dictated by common sense, when people ask for 3* maps they usually mean: I want stuff AROUND 3*. Note that 3.99 is much closer to 4* than 3*.
So 3* is at the focal point of what they’re looking for, and the range of maps they want are centered close to 3*, for example, 2.8-3.2. Unless stated otherwise ofc (I want at least 3* or higher maps, I want maps that aren’t higher than 3*, etc.)
I’ve never interpreted asking for 3 star maps meaning around 3.00; it’s always meant 3.00-3.99 because by common sense all of those maps are officially 3 stars.
When I say I play 5 stars NO ONE has interpreted that as also including 4.8+ because those maps are not 5 stars.
Kheldragar wrote:
I’ve never interpreted asking for 3 star maps meaning around 3.00; it’s always meant 3.00-3.99 because by common sense all of those maps are officially 3 stars.
When I say I play 5 stars NO ONE has interpreted that as also including 4.8+ because those maps are not 5 stars.
2.5-3.5 go under 3 stars, 3.5-4.5 go under 4, etc. etc. Because again, common sense. Osu agrees as well. So I’m not sure of what your interpretation of «official» is in this case.
When people say 3* they’re referring to the maps that are similar in difficulty. Noone really uses this to mean «has 3 in the first digit» Because with this kind of criteria it’s just not very useful when it comes to trying to communicate things about similar difficulties since you’ve essentially arbitrarily created a silly grouping range where the beatmaps that fall in that range that you’ve created are not sorted in much of a meaningful way.
My logic when picking maps was similar to the kind you see in multiplayer lobbies.
For example: In a «4☆ Host Rotation» lobby, I’ve never really seen anybody complain if somebody picks a 4.8-4.9 star map.
Well, sorry for starting a shitstorm.
Official as in the DEFINITION of 3 stars being a map whose difficulty begins with 3.xx
There’s no reason for your «common sense» to mean 3 stars means around 3 as opposed to every diff including 3. NO ONE I have ever met refers to 5.5 as 6 star instead of 5.